Show us a process where humans are doing work software should be doing

Back to blog
technologySeptember 10, 20266 min read

Cost Analysis: Building vs Buying AI Systems

Building an AI system can take 12-24 months and involve high upfront costs, while buying often requires less initial investment. Explore cost analysis for AI systems to decide whether building or buying is right for your workflow.

Start here

Free self-serve assessment.

Open Fit Check

Short answer: Building an AI system can take 12-24 months and requires significant upfront investment, while buying an AI solution often costs less initially but may involve ongoing expenses. Kemeny Studio builds AI that runs your operations, offering insights into these cost implications.

Cost Analysis: Building vs Buying AI Systems

What are the cost dynamics of building an AI system?

Imagine a mid-sized logistics company facing inefficiencies in its supply chain operations. The CTO considers building a custom AI system to address these challenges. This endeavor involves multiple cost components, each with its own set of complexities. Development costs are often the largest component, requiring a significant one-time investment. This includes designing algorithms, writing code, and testing the system to ensure it meets functional requirements. Development alone can consume 40-50% of the total budget.

Once the system is built, the next hurdle is integration. This process is often underestimated, both in terms of time and cost. Integrating a new AI system with existing infrastructure can take several months, incurring additional expenses. The more entrenched the existing systems, the more complex and costly the integration.

Ongoing maintenance and retraining are essential to ensure the AI system remains effective. This can cost 15-25% of the initial development annually. Retraining is particularly crucial as data and operational needs evolve. The logistics company in our scenario might need to update the AI model frequently to adapt to new shipping routes or changes in customer demand.

Infrastructure costs, such as cloud computing resources, add another layer of expense. High-performance computing power is often needed for training AI models, which can lead to substantial recurring costs.

Finally, talent is a critical component. Hiring skilled data scientists and engineers to build and maintain the AI system is expensive. Salaries for these roles can range from $80,000 to $150,000 annually, representing a significant ongoing investment.

Cost ComponentDescription
DevelopmentOne-time, significant investment (40-50% of total budget)
IntegrationLonger than expected, adds costs
Maintenance & Retraining15, 25% of initial development cost annually
InfrastructureCosts for compute resources
TalentCost to maintain system performance

What would it cost in your operation?

The ranges above are the market. This puts your own numbers against them: volume, manual minutes per item, and hourly cost. It returns your payback period and what the workflow returns from year two.

What are the costs of buying an AI system?

Now, consider the alternative: buying an AI system. This option might appeal to the logistics company for its lower initial costs and quicker deployment. However, there are hidden expenses to consider. Licensing fees are a common concern, as they represent a perpetual cost that scales with the system's usage. For instance, an AI platform might charge $10,000 to $50,000 annually, depending on its features and user base.

Integration costs are still a factor, albeit generally lower than building from scratch. Yet, the logistics company might encounter limitations in customization, potentially requiring additional work to tailor the system to their specific needs.

Vendor lock-in is a risk when buying an AI solution. This dependency can limit flexibility and lead to higher costs if the vendor's pricing structure changes or if the company needs to switch providers in the future.

The choice between building and buying often depends on the complexity of the workflows and the urgency of deployment. A pre-built solution might suffice for simpler tasks, but intricate operations could necessitate a more bespoke approach.

What do industry experts say about building vs buying AI systems?

Experts in AI deployment emphasize that the decision to build or buy is not solely a financial one. The total cost of ownership (TCO) depends on several factors beyond immediate costs. Use case complexity is a primary consideration: highly specialized tasks might require custom-built systems, while more generic tasks could be handled by off-the-shelf solutions.

Data quality is another critical factor. Clean, well-organized data can reduce the complexity and cost of both building and buying AI systems. However, poor data quality can lead to increased costs for data cleaning and preprocessing.

Integration depth is crucial as well. A deep integration with existing systems can enhance the functionality of an AI solution but may increase initial setup costs.

Internal capabilities, such as the availability of skilled personnel and existing technological infrastructure, also influence the TCO. Companies with robust internal teams might lean toward building, while those lacking in-house expertise might opt for buying.

A hybrid strategy is often recommended by experts. By starting with a pre-built solution, companies can achieve rapid results and then gradually customize the system as their needs evolve. This approach offers a balance between immediate effectiveness and long-term adaptability.

How does Kemeny Studio approach AI system deployment?

At Kemeny Studio, we specialize in building AI that runs your operations. Our approach is informed by years of experience deploying AI systems across various industries. We understand that building an AI system can be resource-intensive, but it provides unparalleled control and customization. This is particularly valuable for operations with unique requirements, where off-the-shelf solutions fall short.

On the other hand, buying an AI system might offer faster deployment, which is ideal for businesses needing quick solutions. However, it may not always align perfectly with specific operational goals. For example, our AI Workflow Validation Sprint can help determine the most suitable approach by assessing the specific needs and constraints of your operation.

To further assist in decision-making, we recommend the Workflow Fit Check. This tool helps identify the processes that are slowing you down, allowing you to make informed decisions about AI deployment.

Frequently asked questions

What is the main advantage of building an AI system?

Building an AI system allows for greater customization and control over the features and integrations. This is particularly beneficial for complex workflows that require specific functionalities not available in pre-built solutions.

How does buying an AI system benefit a company?

Buying an AI system often results in faster deployment and lower initial costs. It is an attractive option for companies looking for quick implementation without the resource-intensive process of building from scratch.

What factors influence the total cost of ownership in AI systems?

The TCO is influenced by the complexity of the use case, data quality, integration depth, and internal capability. Maintenance, retraining, and ongoing operational costs also play a significant role.

Can a hybrid strategy be effective in AI system deployment?

Yes, a hybrid strategy can be effective. It combines the speed of deploying a pre-built solution with the long-term customization of building, allowing companies to achieve rapid results while planning for future innovation.

How does Kemeny Studio assist in AI system decisions?

Kemeny Studio builds AI that runs your operations and offers services like the AI Workflow Validation Sprint, which helps in evaluating and deciding the best approach to deploy AI systems effectively.

Share

Turn the number into a decision

The ranges on this page are the market. A 10-day validation on one of your workflows turns them into a fixed-scope quote — or tells you to wait.